My wife was showing me Instagram. It’s cool. I know a little about photography, but most of it I learned with film. And most of it doesn’t amount to much.
Instagram is hugely popular, but it’s a Mac thing. Except now an Android version is coming soon.
What I didn’t know about Instagram was that a lot of people hate it. Apparently these are mostly professionals. For instance check out the pro and anti comments on Instagram at Gizmodo.
Here’s a picture I took without Instagram.
Is it good? Beats me, but I like it.
Now, with Instagram, I could do all kinds of stuff to it quickly, just by pressing my finger on one little icon after another. Each creates another cool effect. And I’d be doing this with a phone or an iPad, and I’d have to know nothing about photography to do it.
Now, imagine an artist, a painter, spending hours painting that caboose. Then some dude comes along with a canvas, throws a splash of paint on it, and a computer program instantly creates an amazing painting. I imagine this is going to disgust the artist who spent years learning to paint and hours on this particular composition.
Is this a good analogy for Instagram and why real photographers hate it? Well, maybe, but it’s probably not a great one. Most people never learn to paint, but just about everyone takes pictures. It’s meant to be easy, and it’s meant to be fun. And as long as the casual photographers don’t start thinking Instagram has turned them into artists, what’s the problem?
Or, am I missing the point? There are other reasons to hate Instagram. I thought this one in the comments at the Gizmodo article was particularly interesting.
The issue I have is that instagram attempts to imbue an aura of “authenticity” to the photograph by emulating essentially flaws or fake aging to an image. A faux sense of nostalgia is what is trying to be created. This is how lomography and the use of say Dianas and Holga’s have become popular. Because the flaws are emulated and stylized. However, these stylizations were a product of the specific physics of the cameras and lenses.
So, it’s not about Instagram being a shortcut to artistic greatness, it’s about Instagram being phony. It’s about Instagram simulating (or is emulating the better word) technical anachronisms. And that is kind of phony. Your photos were taken in the 21st century using a piece of super technology and enhanced by some amazing software and there were no chemicals involved and no film, so why do they look like some guy took them from under a black hood? Or in 1950 with a crew cut?
Still, it’s fun, and it’s fun to look at the results, and I can’t wait to get it on my Android.
{ 1 comment }







